Money makes the world go round

“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws” — Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

Lots of people around the globe now live in fear of the financial crisis. Or they are already affected by job loss, reduced income, shrinkage of their business. Daily we get bombarded with statements about the dire consequences of the “Euro meltdown”. Before that it was the US downgrade and debt ceiling… And even before that, there was the “subprime mortgage crisis” leading to the “2008 financial crisis”. Always something ominous threatening your future prospects of prosperity or even your livelihood. Crisis after crisis in other words and no light at the end of the tunnel…

Does it really have to be like this?

And that’s exactly the intention of the dark forces pulling the strings behind the scenes. They want us to live in fear and in the process they want to shake us out of even more of what we still own, gain even more control and get even closer to their fascist global super state, which they have been working towards, one step at a time. The financial system is central to the global power structure. My own wake up process started in earnest about 11 years ago with an inquiry into the nature of the financial system, about 1 or 2 years before we started what should become Orgonise Africa. Yes, I did know about Wilhelm Reich before, yes, I had meditated before and done yoga and stuff like that, but the bigger vista of how different this planet is organised from what we may have learnt at school was triggered by my simple inquiry “what is money?”.
In fact I really went to the public library and searched for books on the subject. Surprisingly there were many books on how to manage finances on a personal, business and national or supranational level, but not a single book on what money actually is and how it is generated.
I was later to find out that I was not alone in my ignorance and that this ignorance is really central  to the continued compliance of the majority with the system.

The great extraction scheme

Books like “The Federal Reserve System” by Eustace Mullins, “The Creature from Jekyll Island” by G. Edward Griffin and various more broad themed books by conspiracy researchers like Gary Allen, (“None dare call it conspiracy”) Jim Marrs (“rule by Secrecy”) or David Icke (“And the Truth shall set you free” and following) did cast some light on the real situation after that. I’ve probably read most of the more important conspiracy research books of any kind by now and amalgamated the information into a relatively coherent picture of what’s going on, at least on the level of so called 3D-reality. Essentially, we know now that money is generated by private banks out of thin air and lent into the economy at interest. These commercial banks operate under license of their respective “Central Bank” that looks like a state institution, but is in fact a “public private partnership” owned by a very small number of elite banking families.

And yes you heard it right: They do not own the money they lend to you, they do not have to borrow it from the “Central Bank” either. They create it the moment they lend it to you. Yes, admittedly they have to balance their books. Banks can go bankrupt. Your indebtedness to them and any collateral you were forced to pledge to back the loan are counting as “activa” in their books against the money that they just created, the “passiva”. So, in a way the banking system has become a machine to monetize material goods that function as collateral. You “buy” a car on hire purchase? The car is the material collateral allowing (together with your income that shows your ability to repay the loan) for the creation of the money to buy that car. Same if you buy a house or a company invests in new production facilities. The bank needs about 10% of cash as a reserve (That’s why our system is also called “fractional reserve banking)  to generate a 100% loan. Most amazingly, now that the new money is created by loaning it out, it becomes a new cash deposit somewhere, maybe in the same or another bank that is part of the same system, allowing another 10x that amount to be generated. That way a snowball effect is generated that can lead to generating of unlimited credit, provided the banks want it to happen and economic data of the borrowers support it.

Money out of thin air – to be repaid at interest

All the money that is created in that way has to be repaid at interest and is thus sucked out of the system again at a higher rate than the original injection. This is the reason why our economic system is forced to constantly grow or else falter. Only if the sum of economic activities and new money created is always bigger next year than last, can the debt incurred last year and before be serviced and some growth still experienced. To a certain degree money is also created without collateral as personal loans, bank overdrafts or credit card debt. In that case “YOU” become the collatteral, or rather your assumed capacity to repay.

Since the beginning of the envirommental movement, people have naively questioned the economic growth paradigm, asking questions like: “why do we always have to have more every year?” “Why does the economy always have to grow?” “Don’t we all have enough already?” These are of course legitimate questions, especially for the youth of the 1970s (that for example me) in first world countries who had never experienced scarcity in their lives. There was of course an instinctive perception of the destructive power of this system but no real understanding of what causes it.

A parasite can only grow or die

This banking system is in place in practically all countries allthough in some countries the central bank may be state owned. The Bank of England for example, founded and owned by the Rothschild banking family in 1694 was nationalised in 1946, but under condition that the Rothschilds would still nominate it’s governour. Control in this case is more important than ownership. You will not be surprised to hear that those countries not yet fully integrated into this system are the same ones that the “Western Powers” are regularly setting up as targets for “regime change”.
To name a few: Libya (until recently), Syria, Iran, North Korea… (you get the picture, eh?)

The first thing the NATO sponsored “rebels” (mercenaries and thieves would be more accurate) had in Libya was THEIR OWN RESERVE BANK. That was the first time, a rebel movement had a central bank before they even had a state.

The system of mostly privately owned “national” central banks is “crowned” by 3 institutions that are equally private in nature. The IMF, the World Bank and the BIS. (owned by the member banks) While the IMF and World bank are more busy with creating dependance and misery in the 3rd world, the BIS is the “bankers’ bank”. Just like the “national” central banks create the frame work in which commercial banks have to operate, the BIS creates the rules under which all national central banks and the subordinated commercial banks operate. Because this highly secretive and discreet organisation is located in Basel, Switzerland, the recent sets of rules for banks are also referred to as Basel I, Basel II, III etc..

They are symptomatic for how corporate rules take on the appearance of actual law while never having been subject to parliamentary approval of any country where they are applied. In fact, adherence to these rules is voluntary, but any bank that wouldn’t, would quickly be out of business, because the rating agencies who are run by the same people (of course) would downgrade their risk rating so fast, they wouldn’t even have time to say the word “bankruptcy”. So, compliance is pretty much 100%. A typical field of BIS regulation is the lending/reserve ratio that determines how much credit banks are allowed to create out of thin air in relation to their actual cash reserves, assets etc.. This has been constantly tightened in the last few years. Ostensibly in the interest of more sound economical principles. These are slogans that appeal to the economically half educated midfdle class world wide of course. But what it does is constrict credit, leading to the marginal borrowers feeling strain. (“subprime risk home owners, nation states like Greece etc) The bubble always burtst at the weakest point of course. The decision when to tighten or not is entirely willful and arbirtrary. No natural laws at work there at all.

Problem – reaction – solution

(how they get us where they want us)

David Icke aptly compares the cycles of boom and bust with the actions of a fisherman: When casting out, the bankers pump money into the economy, everybody starts producing, consuming. New factories are built, everything is humming with activity. New wealth and assets are created. Then the fisherman (the banks) reels in. Credit suddenly gets scarce, money in circulation becomes less. People consume less. Businesses falter, stock prices collapse, tensions in the system rise to unbearable levels. Often downturn cycles like that are leading to an eruption in War, a perfect way for the string pullers to mold the political landscape even more to their liking.
Then all floodgates of new debt creation are suddenly opened again, a bizarre fiesta ofdestruction starts and afterwards there is so much to rebuild, but the ownership structures are forever more concentrated, the political landscape is completely changed.

The “Great depression in 1928″ was the perfect example, culminating in the worldwide destruction of WWII that created the large economic and political Blocks (NATO, Warsaw Pact, EU, UN) that were needed as stepping stones to the one world government the elite is trying to erect. In other words, money is the stranglehold, the self proclaimed elite has on humankind. But only as long as we buy into their story and accept the rules that they have set up for us as some kind of natural law.

Our liberation (and that’s what we want to achieve in 2012, don’t we?) will therefore depend on us understanding the illusionary nature of our bondage and then stepping out of our cage, to begin that wonderful life of abundance that we all want.

Now, in order to tighten their grip on the world and get more control they create “crises” on a regular basis. These have nothing to do with the possible reckless spending or fraudulent accounting of the corrupt Greek government. (or any other, equally corrupt government) It is a decision by those who pull the strings to make credit scarce, thereby reducing the money in circulation and thus creating economic contraction.
Simple as that. The proposed austerity measures will make it worse. (If they wanted they could just continue printing money and make this go on indefinitely. It’s a fraudulent pyramid scheme anyways, so who cares…

That way they get low-low stock prices, many businesses go under and their assets can be gobbled up by the “strong hands” (the sytem affiliated insiders) at rock bottom prices. Misery, doom and gloom spread in the population and the next step into the fascist super state can be forced upon the fearful populace as the “solution” to the crisis.

David Icke, whatever other shortcomings he may have, definitely described this mechanism like nobody else: He calls it the “problem-reaction-solution” pattern, where those who wish for a certain outcome create a problem (the debt crisis) then get a strong reaction (economic fear, the strong wish to return to stability at almost any price) and then present a solution that would have otherwise never been accepted by the victims of the scam. In the case of the Euro crisis this monster is called “European Stability Mechanism” (ESM) and it creates a fund that is above the law of any participating country and overrules any souverign decision by member states. Once a country has signed for it, they can never get out and their parliaments are powerless to alter any of the rules. Bingo!

It is funny how they got us hooked on it, but obviously it’s using our own greed to make us want to be the hamsters in the wheel. So it’s also a spritual problem for us to withdraw our support.

There are basically three schools of thought that seem to be total opposites but share the perception of the problem.

1. Return to gold money

This is normally promoted by the classical Ayn Rand libertarians, most prominently by Ron Paul and the “Tea Party” guys. Basically the idea is to restore real economic freedom.
By returning to a real standard of money, the power to create false credit backed on corrupt state backed monopolies to create money out of nothing, this would create inflation free wealth in the hand of those who produce. Private currencies would be free to compete without any “legal tender laws” and the market (the people) would be free to chose which currency they trust more. Of course there would be no FED. So, even those who would cheat with the gold backing would be punished by the market, accepting them only at a discount.

The disadvantage is that the interests that have run our current system to their sole advantage have also hoarded most of the gold and would still exert unbelievable power.

2. Public banking

I think this is the most attractive immediate solution. What it means is that the state as representative of the “We the People” and in our combined interest, re-asserts the privilege to be the sole generator of new money. It can do so by founding state owned banks under existing banking laws that get state owned assets as backing to create credit under the existing system. The state bank of North Dakota is one such institution that competes with the large commercial banks but is specifically geared to generate credit for local investment and plows it’s profits back into the state budget of North Dakota.

As a result the US state of North Dakota is the only one that recorded net gain of  employment  in the last decade and is in a general state of prosperity. No problems with paying it’s civil servants! This is only the most immediate version where the banking system as such is not put in question. The next step would be to abolish the FED (nationalise it) and take away the credit generating powers from private banks. They can still have some function in channeling loans to enterprises or holding deposits. The nation state would then generate the currency needed to fund all infrastructure and public works as well as any public services by itself at no interest, getting this money to circulate in the broader economy. This could be augmented by municipal and provincial institutions under control of local communities to avoid unsavoury power concentration.

Of course this will have the whole bunch of bankster – indoctrinated “London School of Economics” economists screaming on the barricades immediately. They have been trained to consider just this as the greatest sin on earth. I believe it is principally right because we cannot have a private “for profit” monopoly that is protected by the might of an increasingly fascist state. The argument against a pubic banking model is normally that it’s “Socialist or communist” in approach and that wouldn’t work. I think banking is just the only thing that really needs to be nationalised. After all, the present situation uses the power of the state to enforce an increasingly destructive private extraction scheme. Under a well organised public banking regime there would probably be no need for taxation. The danger lies in who occupies the levers of power in such a set up of course. The chances for abuse are there and checks and balances would have to be built in.

Still it seems the most workable alternative to the present quagmire. That’s unless we reach a state of maturity (hmmm..) that woud enable us to go directly to step 3…

3. Or maybe we need no Money at all

Our friend Michael Tellinger is a big proponent of this. He calls it “Contributionism”. Basically, the idea is that if one wants to get rid of an evil it has to be eradicated completely, not just made to work better. So, Michael thinks that all humans have it in them to contribute their best and no means of exchange is necessary to ensure that everybody gets what they need and want. With all financial incentive lost for control of resources and supression of free energy, the human spirit would blossom and paradise would be created almost automatically.

While we have never hesitated to href=”http://www.orgoniseafrica.com/english/orgone-gifting.html”>make

our contribution to this paradise, I’m not sure if
this can work for all people on this planet immediately.
I also believe that money has an aspect of freedom and
independence in it that we should not throw away
leightheartedly.
Other than our dear friend who believes that money
should be eliminated completely and more or less
immediately, I think we should first think about how we
can take the destructiveness out of the system and “tilt
the table in favour of the people”.

We might or might not ever achieve a degree of spiritual
maturity where everybody produces what everybody else
needs and shares it on a voluntary basis, but I don’t
see that happening immediately.
In the meantime we need to do something that stops the
negative dynamics of the present debt based system of
generating money.

Whatever it is, we can do it!

I think for now we should strive for something that style=”font-style: italic;”>tilts the playing field
in favour of “We The People” and creates a positive

dynamic. I think the public banking idea is very do-able and can be implemented in stages without violent disruption of the day to day economy. Surely, ending theblockage of free energy technology and the stranglehold of the pharmaceutical-petrochemical-military complex is an important element of our liberation. These are the same people who control the money, so taking that away from them, it becomes much more difficult for them to contiue to force us to swallow their poison and burn their oil.

The most essential lesson is:

The future looks exactly the way we want it

We can peacefully wrest command from the barren and bony hands of our deathmongering  wannabe rulers. They already know that their days are numbered and are dead afraid of loosing control. Probably it is their fear of our revenge that drives them to cling to power so ferrociously.
So, what if we tell them they need not worry.

In my world they don’t even have to give up their property (unless it’s outrightly stolen) All we need to do is change the rules so that those that produce real value for others get the resources to do more of the good work.

Abundance and prosperity are the natural state of free humans. It is easy for us to produce a lot more than we
need and thereby create the free space and time for contemplation, art and spiritual development.

And maybe then, a few years later when we have learnt to use the illusion of money in our favour, can we do the next step and create a cooperative contributionist society of freedom and happiness.

I’m sure Orgonite will play a major role in bringing this about.