Posts Tagged "AIDS truth"

Debunking the debunkers – Nathan Geffen and the TAC

Debunking the debunkers – Nathan Geffen and the TAC

Nathan Geffen, a leading activist in the TAC (Treatment Action Campaign) has recently published his book “debunking delusions – the inside story of the TAC”. It is intended as a celebration of AIDS orthodoxy’s final victory over AIDS denialism in South Africa, the victory of “science based medicine” over “Quack-ism”. But is all well in the camp of the advocates of Antiretrovirals? Do they have any scientific basis for their allegations of ARVs being “life prolonging drugs”?

“My body is a machine”

To fully understand the mentality behind the outgoing mechanistic paradigm one should savour this introductory statement by Geffen:

“Most of us understand little about how to treat our ilnesses. we also do not know how to repair our cars when they break down…
…We depend on health providers to make us better and often have, at best, a slight understanding of how our doctor, nurse or traditional or alternative healer does this.” (p 5/6)


This is how the generation of my parents and granparents were programmed to think of their body and health. They accept it as normal to end their lives in a succession of surgical operations, losing a lung here, a quarter of a stomach there, then a gland here and a limb there. Like a car electrician would take out the sophisticated circuitry of a once well appointed car as it gets older. – until the lights go out!

My optometrist, otherwise a witty and quite entertaining guy, paraphrased this worldview a few years ago with the following sentence: “My body is a bag of chemicals with skin around”

Well, I’m sorry mine is not!

But before my sermon gets mistaken for another New-Agey critique of a soul-less but otherwise well functioning medical philosophy, I want to ask the question if the mechanic actually gets the car fixed. (to stay in the metaphor) As we will see there is very little evidence for that. There is a lot more evidence (however carefully surpressed) that the quacks against whom he rants so ferouciously do get the car fixed most of the time with a predictable and significant rate of success.

What’s all the hubbub about?

South Africa has been targeted to be the exemplary country for AIDS, Antiretroviral rollout and the whole multibillion Dollar circus of mass poisoning. A huge genocidal experiment in population reduction and social engineering. When our then president Thabo Mbeki started questioning some of the basic assumptions of ruling AIDS science, such as the causation of the loosely defined “immune deficiency syndrome” by the HIV virus, the efficiency of highly toxic ARVs in combating this allegedly new disease, he was subjected to an intense and spiteful barrage of concerted media attacks. This is actually when I became interseted in the debate. The ferocity and anger behind the attacks on Mbeki was suspicious from the beginning. In fact this started to become a regular feature in the “Mail and Guardian” , the major liberal weekly newspaper in South Africa. At least 1 broadside and 2-3 little stings against Mbeki per issue since he asked for an independent mixed panel of scientists to debate AIDS science during the famous Durban AIDS conference in 2000.

The panel was sabotaged from the beginning by the mainstream scientists who found it beyond their dignity to ever debate on level par with dissidents in the scientific community. Dr. Sam Mhlongo died in a very unlikely car accident with “a runaway truck that could never be found”, Manto is dead, Tina v/d Mass is destitute after 8-9 well targeted (always at her notes and means of survival) robberies “with aggravating circumstances”, Dr. Rath has left the country and nobody talks about dissident views in the accessible public domain any more. (not that they ever had much of a forum in mainstream media) I think very few people in the world really know what Tina v/d Mass has done, what phenomenal healing successes she has achieved and why for a few years a whole government was publicly, albeit not very efficiently, backing the “Lemon, Olive Oil, Garlic and Beetroot Quackery” of one Tina v/d Maas.

Science based medicine

is one of Geffen’s most favourite catch words. He constantly insinnuates that the antiretroviral peddling orthodoxy has the science to show for it, but is that so?

Do yourself a favour and phone the head of the HIV unit at the biggest hospital in the southern Hemisphere, Soweto’s Baragwanath Hospital. Ask someone reasonably high up in the pecking order if they have any follow up on survival of Antiretroviral patients. You will be shocked.

Another funny game you can play is: Ask your sharp young doctor friend to quote the seminal article that prves that “HIV causes AIDS”. You’ll be amazed. Not even Luc Montagneir believes that any more.

However the propaganda machine does not need scientific proof. The onus of proof is only laid upon those who beg to disagree.

It’s a study case for public opinion control by blatant censorship and supression of truth.

The ARV gang is now celebrating their unopposed victory

Manto is dead
Tina is destitute
Thabo is gone
Nobody in government dares supporting dissident views any more.

and yet it’s all bullshit…

read more

So, what if Manto was 100% right about AIDS?

So, what if Manto was 100% right about AIDS?

Dr. Manto Tshabalala Msimang, the embattled former health minister, had drawn a lot of the inspiration for her “controversial” opinions from the work of Tina v/d Maas.

Tina, about whom I have spoken earlier here, is a trained nurse. She has been working in countless AIDS support groups when she came across the potentially disturbing information about the toxicity of those AIDS drugs called “Antiretrovirals” or ARVs that are so loudly promoted by a strange coalition of BIG PHARMA funded Aids activists, the orchestrated press and a plethora of interested parties, mainly from the assortment of NGOs who make a healthy living from pretending to care for the plight of AIDs victims.

The loudest voice in this strange coalition is the TAC (Treatment Action campaign) fronted by Zackie Achmat. From the beginning this organisation has been pushing for making available ARVs to all people being diagnosed with so called HIV/AIDS all arguments of dissent against the mainstream of AIDS science were dismissed by this group and their allies as potentially delaying the distribution of “life prolonging AIDS drugs”.

Even if one wanted to suppose good will and an earnest interest in alleviating the suffering of those affected, how could scientific debate be stifled in the interest of only one solution with such obvious shortcomings?

But is there any merit to suggestive words as “life prolonging AIDS drugs”?

From all I know the opposite is true:

While Tina has established a rate of full recovery in more than 95%* of some 1000 cases that enrolled on her nutritional programme, the ARV programme shows a very different picture:

18% of all those enrolled  at MEDUNSA (Medical University of South Africa)  and stay there are dead after 6 months.

How come you haven’t heard of Tina v/d Maas?

How come so many of even nice and well meaning people believe that Dr. Manto is a threat to humanity and a crackpot that can be vilified with impunity?

Well, this is how mind control works!

A lot has been written about AIDS but most people only know the official standpoint. I am not a scientist but a lot of what people like Duesberg (“Inventing the AIDS virus”) say makes a lot of sense. The jury is of course still out whether the group of symptoms that constitute “Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome”(a definition that has constantly changed over the decades since AIDS was officially “discovered” in the 1980s) is caused by functional malnutrition, by the unintentional erosion of the immune system through vaccination  or by a covert genocidal programme administered through the WHO hepatitis B vaccination programmes, as suggested by Dr. Len Horowitz in his well researched book “Aids and Ebola – emerging viruses”.

Surely, we should insist on having an open scientific debate as it was initiated by our ousted president Thabo Mbeki and sabotaged by the medical establishment ever since.

In the meantime, I revel in the knowledge that AIDS can be easily cured by Tina’s easy nutritional cleaning and nutrition programme as well as in many cases by just using a simple zapper, proper food and clean water.

It is sad to see that millions of people in Africa are denied the chance of knowing about the simple truth that the prolific consumption of sugar and other “empty carbohydrates” such as white maize meal corrupts their immune system and on it’s very own leads to all the symptoms of so called AIDS.

The only criticism that I have of Dr Manto Tshabalala Msimang is that she did not move more decisively to get the truth out and implement a programme that could by know have prevented tens of thousands of unnecessary deaths and restored hundred of thousands to perfect health.

The true tragedy of Manto is that she got bashed for something she’s never done because she wasn’t able to.

If only “Dr. Beetroot” had put everybody who needs it on a programme of Lemon, garlic and olive oil…

If she had only made Tina a director general in the depertnmenbt of health, responsible for health edication and nutritional intervention….

But of course I am too harsh on her a she had a gun to her head as everyone would who dares to allow some truth in however minute quantities to infiltrate government work.

Manto is a hero!

*90% of those cases who could not sit up, or eat unassisted, 95% of those who could sit up but not stand or walk and 99% of those who could at least walk on crutches made a full recovery.

read more